Paper detail

Additional Evidence Supporting a Model of Shallow, High-Speed Supergranulation

Recently, Duvall and Hanasoge ({\it Solar Phys.} {\bf 287}, 71-83, 2013) found that large distance $[Δ]$ separation travel-time differences from a center to an annulus $[δt_{\rm{oi}}]$ implied a model of the average supergranular cell that has a peak upflow of $240\rm{ms^{-1}}$ at a depth of $2.3\rm{Mm}$ and a corresponding peak outward horizontal flow of $700\rm{ms^{-1}}$ at a depth of $1.6\rm{Mm}$. In the present work, this effect is further studied by measuring and modeling center-to-quadrant travel-time differences $[δt_{\rm{qu}}]$, which roughly agree with this model. Simulations are analyzed that show that such a model flow would lead to the expected travel-time differences. As a check for possible systematic errors, the center-to-annulus travel-time differences $[δt_{\rm{oi}}]$ are found not to vary with heliocentric angle. A consistency check finds an increase of $δt_{\rm{oi}}$ with the temporal frequency $[ν]$ by a factor of two, which is not predicted by the ray theory.

preprint2014arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.