Paper detail

Adding species to chemical reaction networks: preserving rank preserves nondegenerate behaviours

We show that adding new chemical species into the reactions of a chemical reaction network (CRN) in such a way that the rank of the network remains unchanged preserves its capacity for multiple nondegenerate equilibria and/or periodic orbits. One consequence is that any bounded nondegenerate behaviours which can occur in a CRN can occur in a CRN with bounded stoichiometric classes. The main result adds to a family of theorems which tell us which enlargements of a CRN preserve its capacity for nontrivial dynamical behaviours. It generalises some earlier claims, and complements similar claims involving the addition of reactions into CRNs. The result gives us information on how ignoring some chemical species, as is common in biochemical modelling, might affect the allowed dynamics in differential equation models of CRNs. We demonstrate the scope and limitations of the main theorem via several examples. These illustrate how we can use the main theorem to predict multistationarity and oscillation in CRNs enlarged with additional species; but also how the enlargements can introduce new behaviours such as additional periodic orbits and new bifurcations.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.