Paper detail

Adding edge dynamics to bipartite random-access networks

We consider random-access networks with nodes representing transmitter-receiver pairs whose signals interfere with each other depending on their vicinity. Data packets arrive at the nodes over time and form queues. The nodes can be either active or inactive: a node deactivates at unit rate, while it activates at a rate that depends on its queue length, provided none of its neighbors is active. In order to model the effects of user mobility in wireless networks, we analyze dynamic interference graphs where the edges are allowed to appear and disappear over time. We focus on bipartite graphs and study the transition time between the two states where one part of the network is active and the other part is inactive, in the limit as the queue lengths become large. Depending on the speed of the dynamics, we are able to obtain a rough classification of the effects of the dynamics on the transition time.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.