Abstract

We revisit our previous work [Phys. Rev. D 95, 096014 (2017)] where neutrino oscillation and nonoscillation data were analyzed in the standard framework with three neutrino families, in order to constrain their absolute masses and to probe their ordering (either normal, NO, or inverted, IO). We include updated oscillation results to discuss best fits and allowed ranges for the two squared mass differences δm2δm^2 and Δm2Δm^2, the three mixing angles θ12θ_{12}, θ23θ_{23} and θ13θ_{13}, as well as constraints on the CP-violating phase δδ, plus significant indications in favor of NO vs IO at the level of Δχ2=10.0Δχ^2=10.0. We then consider nonoscillation data from beta decay, from neutrinoless double beta decay (if neutrinos are Majorana), and from various cosmological input variants (in the data or the model) leading to results dubbed as default, aggressive, and conservative. In the default option, we obtain from nonoscillation data an extra contribution Δχ2=2.2Δχ^2 = 2.2 in favor of NO, and an upper bound on the sum of neutrino masses Σ<0.15Σ< 0.15 eV at 2σ2σ; both results - dominated by cosmology - can be strengthened or weakened by using more aggressive or conservative options, respectively. Taking into account such variations, we find that the combination of all (oscillation and nonoscillation) neutrino data favors NO at the level of 3.2−3.7σ3.2-3.7σ, and that ΣΣ is constrained at the 2σ2σ level within Σ<0.12−0.69Σ< 0.12-0.69 eV. The upper edge of this allowed range corresponds to an effective ββ-decay neutrino mass mβ=Σ/3=0.23m_β= Σ/3 = 0.23 eV, at the sensitivity frontier of the KATRIN experiment.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.