Paper detail

Adaptive Video Streaming for Wireless Networks with Multiple Users and Helpers

We consider the optimal design of a scheduling policy for adaptive video streaming in a wireless network formed by several users and helpers. A feature of such networks is that any user is typically in the range of multiple helpers. Hence, in order to cope with user-helper association, load balancing and inter-cell interference, an efficient streaming policy should allow the users to dynamically select the helper node to download from, and determine adaptively the video quality level of the download. In order to obtain a tractable formulation, we follow a "divide and conquer" approach: i) Assuming that each video packet (chunk) is delivered within its playback delay ("smooth streaming regime"), the problem is formulated as a network utility maximization (NUM), subject to queue stability, where the network utility function is a concave and componentwise non-decreasing function of the users' video quality measure. ii) We solve the NUM problem by using a Lyapunov Drift Plus Penalty approach, obtaining a scheme that naturally decomposes into two sub-policies referred to as "congestion control" (adaptive video quality and helper station selection) and "transmission scheduling" (dynamic allocation of the helper-user physical layer transmission rates).Our solution is provably optimal with respect to the proposed NUM problem, in a strong per-sample path sense. iii) Finally, we propose a method to adaptively estimate the maximum queuing delays, such that each user can calculate its pre-buffering and re-buffering time in order to cope with the fluctuations of the queuing delays. Through simulations, we evaluate the performance of the proposed algorithm under realistic assumptions of a network with densely deployed helper nodes, and demonstrate the per-sample path optimality of the proposed solution by considering a non-stationary non-ergodic scenario with user mobility, VBR video coding.

preprint2015arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.