Paper detail

Adaptive Computation of the Swap-Insert Correction Distance

The Swap-Insert Correction distance from a string $S$ of length $n$ to another string $L$ of length $m\geq n$ on the alphabet $[1..d]$ is the minimum number of insertions, and swaps of pairs of adjacent symbols, converting $S$ into $L$. Contrarily to other correction distances, computing it is NP-Hard in the size $d$ of the alphabet. We describe an algorithm computing this distance in time within $O(d^2 nm g^{d-1})$, where there are $n_α$ occurrences of $α$ in $S$, $m_α$ occurrences of $α$ in $L$, and where $g=\max_{α\in[1..d]} \min\{n_α,m_α-n_α\}$ measures the difficulty of the instance. The difficulty $g$ is bounded by above by various terms, such as the length of the shortest string $S$, and by the maximum number of occurrences of a single character in $S$. Those results illustrate how, in many cases, the correction distance between two strings can be easier to compute than in the worst case scenario.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.