Paper detail

Adapting Caching to Audience Retention Rate: Which Video Chunk to Store?

Rarely do users watch online contents entirely. We study how to take this into account to improve the performance of cache systems for video-on-demand and video-sharing platforms in terms of traffic reduction on the core network. We exploit the notion of "Audience retention rate", introduced by mainstream online content platforms and measuring the popularity of different parts of the same video content. We first characterize the performance limits of a cache able to store parts of videos, when the popularity and the audience retention rate of each video are available to the cache manager. We then relax the assumption of known popularity and we propose a LRU (Least Recently Used) cache replacement policy that operates on the first chunks of each video. We characterize its performance by extending the well-known Che's approximation to this case. We prove that, by refining the chunk granularity, the chunk-LRU policy increases its performance. It is shown numerically that even for a small number of chunks (N=20), the gains of chunk-LRU are still significant in comparison to standard LRU policy that caches entire files, and they are almost optimal.

preprint2015arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.