Paper detail

Adaptation of the tapered double cantilever beam test for the measurement of fracture energy and its variations with crack speed

In this work we present the design of a new test geometry inspired by the Tapered Double Cantilever Beam (TDCB) specimen that is shown to provide an improved characterization of the fracture properties of brittle solids. First, we show that our new design results in an exponential increase of the specimen compliance with crack length, leading to an extremely stable crack growth during the test. We determine an analytical description of this behavior, which provides a simple procedure to extract the fracture energy without depending on finite element calculations. Validation tests are done on polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) specimens. We use both finite element simulations and our analytical model to interpret the data. We find a very good agreement between the toughness determined by both methods. The stable nature of crack growth in our improved TDCB specimens results in a precise control of the crack speed. This feature is employed to go one step further and characterize the variations of toughness with crack speed. We propose an original optimization procedure for the determination of the material parameters characterizing the kinetic law describing the toughness rate dependency. Overall, the approach proposed together with the newly designed test geometry offer unprecedented possibilities for the full and accurate characterization of the fracture behavior of brittle materials such as rocks, sandstone, mortar etc.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.