Paper detail

Active microrheology of Chaetopterus mucus determines three intrinsic lengthscales that govern material properties

We characterize the scale-dependent rheological properties of mucus from the Chaetopterus marine worm and determine the intrinsic lengthscales controlling distinct rheological and structural regimes. Mucus produced by this ubiquitous filter feeder serves a host of roles including filtration, protection and trapping nutrients. The ease of clean mucus extraction coupled with similarities to human mucus rheology also make Chaetopterus mucus a potential model system for elucidating human mucus mechanics. We use optically trapped microsphere probes of 2-10 microns, to induce oscillatory strains and measure mucus stress response. We show that viscoelastic properties are highly dependent on the strain scale (l) with three distinct regimes emerging: microscale: l_1<4 microns, mesoscale: l_2~4-10 microns, and macroscale: l_3>10 microns. While mucus response is similar to water for l_1 indicating that probes rarely contact the mucus mesh, for l_2 the response is distinctly more viscous and independent of probe size, demonstrating that the mucus behaves as a continuum. However, this principally viscous mesoscale response is distinct from the largely elastic macroscopic mucus response. Only for l_3 does the response mimic macroscopic elasticity, with rigid constraints strongly resisting microsphere displacement. Our results demonstrate that a uniform mesh model for mucus with a single lengthscale modulating the crossover from water-like to elastic is too simplistic. Rather, the mucus responds as a hierarchical network with a loose microscopic mesh controlling mechanics for l_2, coupled with a mesoscale rigid scaffold responsible for the macroscopic gel-like mechanics beyond l_3. Our results shed important new light onto the design of drug delivery platforms, preventing pathogen penetration, and improving filtration, coating and clearance capabilities of mucus.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access7 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.