Paper detail

Active Galactic Nuclei Selected from GALEX Spectroscopy: The Ionizing Source Spectrum at z~1

We use a complete sample of Lya emission-line selected AGNs obtained from nine deep blank fields observed with the grism spectrographs on the Galaxy Evolution Explorer (GALEX) satellite to measure the normalization and spectral shape of the AGN contribution to the ionizing background (rest-frame wavelengths 700-900 A) at z~1. Our sample consists of 139 sources selected in the redshift range z=0.65-1.25 in the near-ultraviolet (NUV; 2371 A central wavelength) channel. The area covered is 8.2 square degrees to a NUV magnitude of 20.5 (AB) and 0.92 square degrees at the faintest magnitude limit of 21.8. The GALEX AGN luminosity function agrees well with those obtained using optical and X-ray AGN samples, and the measured redshift evolution of the ionizing volume emissivity is similar to that previously obtained by measuring the GALEX far-ultraviolet (FUV; 1528 A central wavelength) magnitudes of an X-ray selected sample. For the first time we are able to construct the shape of the ionizing background at z~1 in a fully self-consistent way.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.