Paper detail

Active Galactic Nuclei in Groups and Clusters of Galaxies: Detection and Host Morphology

The incidence and properties of Active Galactic Nuclei (AGN) in the field, groups, and clusters can provide new information about how these objects are triggered and fueled, similar to how these environments have been employed to study galaxy evolution. We have obtained new XMM-Newton observations of seven X-ray selected groups and poor clusters with 0.02 < z < 0.06 for comparison with previous samples that mostly included rich clusters and optically-selected groups. Our final sample has ten groups and six clusters in this low-redshift range (split at a velocity dispersion of $σ= 500$ km/s). We find that the X-ray selected AGN fraction increases from $f_A(L_X>10^{41}; M_R<M_R^*+1) = 0.047^{+0.023}_{-0.016}$ in clusters to $0.091^{+0.049}_{-0.034}$ for the groups (85% significance), or a factor of two, for AGN above an 0.3-8keV X-ray luminosity of $10^{41}$ erg/s hosted by galaxies more luminous than $M_R^*+1$. The trend is similar, although less significant, for a lower-luminosity host threshold of $M_R = -20$ mag. For many of the groups in the sample we have also identified AGN via standard emission-line diagnostics and find that these AGN are nearly disjoint from the X-ray selected AGN. Because there are substantial differences in the morphological mix of galaxies between groups and clusters, we have also measured the AGN fraction for early-type galaxies alone to determine if the differences are directly due to environment, or indirectly due to the change in the morphological mix. We find that the AGN fraction in early-type galaxies is also lower in clusters $f_{A,n>2.5}(L_X>10^{41}; M_R<M_R^*+1) = 0.048^{+0.028}_{-0.019}$ compared to $0.119^{+0.064}_{-0.044}$ for the groups (92% significance), a result consistent with the hypothesis that the change in AGN fraction is directly connected to environment.

preprint2009arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.