Paper detail

Acquisition of Visual Features Through Probabilistic Spike-Timing-Dependent Plasticity

The final version of this paper has been published in IEEEXplore available at http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7727213. Please cite this paper as: Amirhossein Tavanaei, Timothee Masquelier, and Anthony Maida, Acquisition of visual features through probabilistic spike-timing-dependent plasticity. IEEE International Joint Conference on Neural Networks. pp. 307-314, IJCNN 2016. This paper explores modifications to a feedforward five-layer spiking convolutional network (SCN) of the ventral visual stream [Masquelier, T., Thorpe, S., Unsupervised learning of visual features through spike timing dependent plasticity. PLoS Computational Biology, 3(2), 247-257]. The original model showed that a spike-timing-dependent plasticity (STDP) learning algorithm embedded in an appropriately selected SCN could perform unsupervised feature discovery. The discovered features where interpretable and could effectively be used to perform rapid binary decisions in a classifier. In order to study the robustness of the previous results, the present research examines the effects of modifying some of the components of the original model. For improved biological realism, we replace the original non-leaky integrate-and-fire neurons with Izhikevich-like neurons. We also replace the original STDP rule with a novel rule that has a probabilistic interpretation. The probabilistic STDP slightly but significantly improves the performance for both types of model neurons. Use of the Izhikevich-like neuron was not found to improve performance although performance was still comparable to the IF neuron. This shows that the model is robust enough to handle more biologically realistic neurons. We also conclude that the underlying reasons for stable performance in the model are preserved despite the overt changes to the explicit components of the model.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.