Paper detail

Acquaintance Time of a Graph

We define the following parameter of connected graphs. For a given graph $G$ we place one agent in each vertex of $G$. Every pair of agents sharing a common edge is declared to be acquainted. In each round we choose some matching of $G$ (not necessarily a maximal matching), and for each edge in the matching the agents on this edge swap places. After the swap, again, every pair of agents sharing a common edge become acquainted, and the process continues. We define the \emph{acquaintance time} of a graph $G$, denoted by $AC(G)$, to be the minimal number of rounds required until every two agents are acquainted. We first study the acquaintance time for some natural families of graphs including the path, expanders, the binary tree, and the complete bipartite graph. We also show that for all positive integers $n$ and $k \leq n^{1.5}$ there exists an $n$-vertex graph $G$ such that $AC(G) =Θ(k)$. We also prove that for all $n$-vertex connected graphs $G$ we have $AC(G) = O\left(\frac{n^2}{\log(n)/\log\log(n)}\right)$, improving the $O(n^2)$ trivial upper bound achieved by sequentially letting each agent perform depth-first search along a spanning tree of $G$. Studying the computational complexity of this problem, we prove that for any constant $t \geq 1$ the problem of deciding that a given graph $G$ has $AC(G) \leq t$ or $AC(G) \geq 2t$ is $\mathcal{NP}$-complete. That is, $AC(G)$ is $\mathcal{NP}$-hard to approximate within multiplicative factor of 2, as well as within any additive constant factor. On the algorithmic side, we give a deterministic algorithm that given a graph $G$ with $AC(G)=1$ finds a ${\lceil n/c\rceil}$-rounds strategy for acquaintance in time $n^{c+O(1)}$. We also design a randomized polynomial time algorithm that given a graph $G$ with $AC(G)=1$ finds with high probability an $O(\log(n))$-rounds strategy for acquaintance.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors4 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.