Paper detail

Acoustic detection of astrophysical neutrinos in South Pole ice

When high-energy particles interact in dense media to produce a particle shower, most of the shower energy is deposited in the medium as heat. This causes the medium to expand locally and emit a shock wave with a medium-dependent peak frequency on the order of 10 kHz. In South Pole ice in particular, the elastic properties of the medium have been theorized to provide good coupling of particle energy to acoustic energy. The acoustic attenuation length has been theorized to be several km, which could enable a sparsely instrumented large-volume detector to search for rare signals from high-energy astrophysical neutrinos. We simulated a hybrid optical/radio/acoustic extension to the IceCube array, specifically intended to detect cosmogenic (GZK) neutrinos with multiple methods simultaneously in order to achieve high confidence in a discovered signal and to measure angular, temporal, and spectral distributions of GZK neutrinos. This work motivated the design, deployment, and operation of the South Pole Acoustic Test Setup (SPATS). The main purpose of SPATS is to measure the acoustic attenuation length, sound speed profile, noise floor, and transient noise sources \emph{in situ} at the South Pole. We describe the design, performance, and results from SPATS. We measured the sound speed in the fully dense ice between 200 m and 500 m depth to be 3878 $\pm$ 12 m/s for pressure waves and 1975.8 $\pm$ 8.0 m/s for shear waves. We measured the acoustic amplitude attenuation length to be 316 $\pm$ 105 m. We measured the background noise floor to be Gaussian and very stable on all time scales from one second to two years. Finally, we have detected an interesting set of well-reconstructed transient events in over one year of high quality transient data acquisition. We conclude with a discussion of what is next for SPATS and of the prospects for acoustic neutrino detection in ice.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.