Paper detail

ACME: A Partially Periodic Estimator of Avian & Chiropteran Mortality at Wind Turbines

Estimating the mortality of birds and bats at wind turbines based on periodic carcass counts is challenging because carcasses may be removed by scavengers or may be missed in investigators' searches, leading to undercounting. Existing mortality estimators intended to correct for this offer wildly different estimates when search intervals are short. We introduce a new estimator that includes many existing ones as special cases but extends and improves them in three ways to reflect phenomena discovered in the field: * Decreasing removal rate by scavengers as carcasses age; * Diminishing proficiency of Field Technicians in discovering carcasses as they age; * Possibility that some (but not all) carcasses arriving in earlier search periods may be discovered in the current period. It is this feature that makes the new estimator "partially periodic". Both point estimates and 50% and 90% Objective Bayes interval estimates are provided for mortality. The new ACME mortality estimator will significantly improve the accuracy and credibility of mortality estimates for birds and bats near wind turbines.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.