Paper detail

Achieving Utility-Delay-Reliability Tradeoff in Stochastic Network Optimization with Finite Buffers

One practical open problem is the development of a distributed algorithm that achieves near-optimal utility using only a finite (and small) buffer size for queues in a stochastic network. This paper studies utility maximization (or cost minimization) in a finite-buffer regime and considers the corresponding delay and reliability (or rate of packet drops) tradeoff. A floating-queue algorithm allows the stochastic network optimization framework to be implemented with finite buffers at the cost of packet drops. Further, the buffer size requirement is significantly smaller than previous works in this area. With a finite buffer size of $B$ packets, the proposed algorithm achieves within $O(e^{-B})$ of the optimal utility while maintaining average per-hop delay of $O(B)$ and an average per-hop drop rate of $O(e^{-B})$ in steady state. From an implementation perspective, the floating-queue algorithm requires little modification of the well-known Drift-Plus-Penalty policy (including MaxWeight and Backpressure policies). As a result, the floating-queue algorithm inherits the distributed and low complexity nature of these policies.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.