Paper detail

Achieving Correlated Equilibrium by Studying Opponent's Behavior Through Policy-Based Deep Reinforcement Learning

Game theory is a very profound study on distributed decision-making behavior and has been extensively developed by many scholars. However, many existing works rely on certain strict assumptions such as knowing the opponent's private behaviors, which might not be practical. In this work, we focused on two Nobel winning concepts, the Nash equilibrium and the correlated equilibrium. Specifically, we successfully reached the correlated equilibrium outside the convex hull of the Nash equilibria with our proposed deep reinforcement learning algorithm. With the correlated equilibrium probability distribution, we also propose a mathematical model to inverse the calculation of the correlated equilibrium probability distribution to estimate the opponent's payoff vector. With those payoffs, deep reinforcement learning learns why and how the rational opponent plays, instead of just learning the regions for corresponding strategies and actions. Through simulations, we showed that our proposed method can achieve the optimal correlated equilibrium and outside the convex hull of the Nash equilibrium with limited interaction among players.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.