Paper detail

Accurate Predictions of Volatile Plutonium Thermodynamic Properties

The ability to predict the nature and amounts of plutonium emissions in industrial accidents, such as in solvent fires at PUREX nuclear reprocessing facilities, is a key concern of nuclear safety agencies. In accident conditions and in the presence of oxygen and water vapor, plutonium is expected to form the three major volatile species $\rm{PuO_2}$, $\rm{PuO_3}$, and $\rm{PuO_2(OH)_2}$, for which the thermodynamic data necessary for predictions (enthalpies of formation and heat capacities) presently show either large uncertainties or are lacking. In this work we aim to alleviate such shortcomings by obtaining the aforementioned data via relativistic correlated electronic structure calculations employing a two-step multi-reference approach (MS-CASPT2 with SO-RASSI), which is able to describe the multireference character of the ground-state wave functions of $\rm{PuO_3}$ and $\rm{PuO_2(OH)_2}$. We benchmark this approach by comparing it to relativistic coupled cluster calculations for the ground, ionized, and excited states of $\rm{PuO_2}$. Our results allow us to predict enthalpies of formation $Δ_fH^\ominus(\rm{298.15~K})$ of $\rm{PuO_2}$, $\rm{PuO_3}$ and $\rm{PuO_2(OH)_2}$ to be $\rm{-449.5\pm8.8}$, $\rm{-553.2\pm27.5}$, and $\rm{-1012.6\pm38.1~kJ\;mol^{-1}}$, respectively, which confirm the predominance of plutonium dioxide, but also reveal the existence of plutonium trioxide in the gaseous phase under oxidative conditions, though the partial pressures of $\rm{PuO_3}$ and $\rm{PuO_2(OH)_2}$ are nonetheless always rather low under a wet atmosphere. Our calculations also permit us to reassess prior results for $\rm{PuO_2}$, establishing that the ground state of the $\rm{PuO_2}$ molecule is mainly of $\rm{^{5}Σ_{g}^+}$ character, as well as to confirm the experimental value for the adiabatic ionization energy of $\rm{PuO_2}$.

preprint2019arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.