Paper detail

Accurate measurement of the HI column density from HI 21cm absorption-emission spectroscopy

We present a detailed study of an estimator of the HI column density, based on a combination of HI 21cm absorption and HI 21cm emission spectroscopy. This "isothermal" estimate is given by $N_{\rm HI,ISO} = 1.823 \times 10^{18} \int \left[ τ_{\rm tot} \times {\rm T_B} \right] / \left[ 1 - e^{-τ_{\rm tot}} \right] {\rm dV}$, where $τ_{\rm tot}$ is the total HI 21cm optical depth along the sightline and ${\rm T_B}$ is the measured brightness temperature. We have used a Monte Carlo simulation to quantify the accuracy of the isothermal estimate by comparing the derived $N_{\rm HI,ISO}$ with the true HI column density $N_{\rm HI}$. The simulation was carried out for a wide range of sightlines, including gas in different temperature phases and random locations along the path. We find that the results are statistically insensitive to the assumed gas temperature distribution and the positions of different phases along the line of sight. The median value of the ratio of the true H{\sc i} column density to the isothermal estimate, $N_{\rm HI}/{N_{\rm HI, ISO}}$, is within a factor of 2 of unity while the 68.2% confidence intervals are within a factor of $\approx 3$ of unity, out to high HI column densities, $\le 5 \times 10^{23}$\,cm$^{-2}$ per 1 km s$^{-1}$ channel, and high total optical depths, $\le 1000$. The isothermal estimator thus provides a significantly better measure of the HI column density than other methods, within a factor of a few of the true value even at the highest columns, and should allow us to directly probe the existence of high HI column density gas in the Milky Way.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.