Paper detail

Accurate Ground-based Astrometry of Naked-eye Stars: The United States Naval Observatory Bright-Star Astrometric Database

We present the United States Naval Observatory (USNO) Bright-Star Astrometric Database (UBAD), a current-epoch high-accuracy astrometric catalog. The catalog consists of 364 bright northern hemisphere stars, including all but five such stars with either $V < 3.5$ or with $I < 3.2$ and $V < 6$, as well as a large fraction of slightly fainter stars; 36 of the brightest catalog stars are not included in Gaia Early Data Release 3 (EDR3). Observations were conducted with the USNO, Flagstaff Station, Kaj Strand 61-inch Astrometric Reflector. Target stars were imaged through a small 12.5-magnitude neutral-density spot, while the remainder of the stars in the field of view were unattenuated. This allowed for unsaturated images of the bright target stars to be calibrated directly against much fainter reference stars from Gaia EDR3. The median position errors are 1.9 mas in both right ascension and declination at the catalog epoch of 2017.0, with 90% of catalog stars having errors less than 2.6 mas; systematic errors are 1 -- 3 mas. Combining UBAD observations with Hipparcos-2 positions yields proper motions with median errors of 0.045 and 0.049 mas year$^{-1}$ in right ascension and declination, respectively, with 90% of stars having errors less than 0.1 mas year$^{-1}$; systematic errors are about 0.1 mas year$^{-1}$. Single-frame accuracy for positions of the target stars is typically 5 -- 6 mas. Gaia EDR3 astrometry for these bright stars, which are heavily saturated in the Gaia observations, is validated over the magnitude range $2 \lesssim G \lesssim 6$.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.