Paper detail

Accurate and Approximate Calculations of Raman Scattering in the Atmosphere of Neptune

Raman scattering by H$_2$ in Neptune's atmosphere has significant effects on its reflectivity for $λ<$ 0.5 $μ$m, producing baseline decreases of $\sim$ 20% in a clear atmosphere and $\sim$ 10% in a hazy atmosphere. Here we present the first radiation transfer algorithm that includes both polarization and Raman scattering and facilitates computation of spatially resolved spectra. New calculations show that Cochran and Trafton's (1978, Astrophys. J. 219, 756-762) suggestion that light reflected in the deep CH$_4$ bands is mainly Raman scattered is not valid for current estimates of the CH$_4$vertical distribution, which implies only a 4% Raman contribution. Comparisons with IUE, HST, and groundbased observations confirm that high altitude haze absorption is reducing Neptune's geometric albedo by $\sim$6% in the 0.22-0.26 $μ$m range and by $\sim$13% in the 0.35-0.45 $μ$m range. We used accurate calculations to evaluate several approximations of Raman scattering. The Karkoschka (1994, Icarus 111, 174-192) method of removing Raman effects from observed spectra is shown to have limited applicability and to undercorrect the depths of weak CH$_4$ absorption bands. The Wallace (1972, Astrophys. J. 176, 249-257) approximation produces geometric albedo values $\sim$5% low as originally proposed, but can be much improved by adding scattering contributions from the vibrational transition. The Pollack et al. (1986, Icarus 65, 442-466) approximation is inaccurate and unstable, but can also be improved greatly by several simple modifications. A new approximation provides low errors for zenith angles below 70°in a clear atmosphere, although intermediate clouds present problems at longer wavelengths.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.