Paper detail

Accuracy of the recovered flux of extended sources obscured by bad pixels in the central EPIC FOV

A fraction of the XMM-Newton/EPIC FOV is obscured by the dysfunctional (i.e. bad) pixels. The fraction varies between different EPIC instruments in a given observation. These complications affect the analysis of extended X-ray sources observed with XMM-Newton/EPIC and the consequent scientific interpretation of the results. For example, the accuracy of the widely used cosmological probe of the gas mass of clusters of galaxies depends on the accuracy of the procedure of removing the obscuration effect from the measured flux. The Science Analysis Software (SAS) includes an option for recovering the lost fraction of the flux measured by a primary instrument by utilising a supplementary image of the same source. The correction may be accurate if the supplementary image is minimally obscured at the locations of the bad pixels of the primary instrument. This can be achieved e.g. by using the observation-based MOS2 image for correcting the pn flux, or by using a synthetic model image. By utilising a sample of 27 galaxy cluster observations we evaluated the accuracy of the recovery method based on observed images, as implemented in SAS 18.0.0. We found that the accuracy of the recovered total flux in the 0.5-7.0 keV band in the full geometric area within the central r = 6 arcmin is better than 0.1% on average while in some individual cases the recovered flux may be uncertain by ~1%.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.