Paper detail

Accuracy of the component mass estimation methods in LMXB

There is a mismatch between modelled and observed distributions of optical stars masses in BH LMXB. Companion masses in BH LMXB are found in the mass range 0.1 - 1.6 $M_{\odot}$ with the peak at 0.6 $M_{\odot}$. The standard evolutionary scenarios require the donor mass distribution peaks to be at least $\sim 1\, M_{\odot}$ to eject a massive envelope of the black hole progenitor. Imperfect of the methods of optical stars masses determination may cause this difference. Two common used approximations of real Roche lobe filling star as distortion sources have been tested. On the one hand, there is the a approximation of real Roche lobe filling optical stars as sphere. We tested rotational broadening of absorption lines based on an exact calculation of CaI $λ6439.075 \, Å$ absorption profiles in the spectra of Roche lobe filling optical stars. There is overestimation of projected equatorial rotational velocity $V_{rot} \sin i$ and, accordingly, underestimation of mass ratio $q=M_x/M_v$ in the spherical star model. On the other hand, the approximation of a real Roche lobe filling star as disk with uniform local profile and linear limb darkening law is more rough. In this case overestimation of projected equatorial rotational velocity $V_{rot} \sin i$ is $ \sim 20\%$. Such overestimation of $V_{rot} \sin i$ can result in significant underestimation of mass ratio $q=M_x/M_v$ at hight value of $q=M_x/M_v$. Refined value of $q$ does not affect the mass of a black hole, but the mass of an optical star has shrunk 1.5 times. Hence, the masses of optical stars in BH LMXB must be corrected downward, despite the contradictions to the standard evolutionary scenarios.

preprint2016arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.