Accuracy of the component mass estimation methods in LMXB

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Abstract

There is a mismatch between modelled and observed distributions of optical stars masses in BH LMXB. Companion masses in BH LMXB are found in the mass range 0.1 - 1.6 M⊙M_{\odot} with the peak at 0.6 M⊙M_{\odot}. The standard evolutionary scenarios require the donor mass distribution peaks to be at least ∼1 M⊙\sim 1\, M_{\odot} to eject a massive envelope of the black hole progenitor. Imperfect of the methods of optical stars masses determination may cause this difference. Two common used approximations of real Roche lobe filling star as distortion sources have been tested. On the one hand, there is the a approximation of real Roche lobe filling optical stars as sphere. We tested rotational broadening of absorption lines based on an exact calculation of CaI λ6439.075 A˚λ6439.075 \, Å absorption profiles in the spectra of Roche lobe filling optical stars. There is overestimation of projected equatorial rotational velocity Vrotsin⁡iV_{rot} \sin i and, accordingly, underestimation of mass ratio q=Mx/Mvq=M_x/M_v in the spherical star model. On the other hand, the approximation of a real Roche lobe filling star as disk with uniform local profile and linear limb darkening law is more rough. In this case overestimation of projected equatorial rotational velocity Vrotsin⁡iV_{rot} \sin i is ∼20% \sim 20\%. Such overestimation of Vrotsin⁡iV_{rot} \sin i can result in significant underestimation of mass ratio q=Mx/Mvq=M_x/M_v at hight value of q=Mx/Mvq=M_x/M_v. Refined value of qq does not affect the mass of a black hole, but the mass of an optical star has shrunk 1.5 times. Hence, the masses of optical stars in BH LMXB must be corrected downward, despite the contradictions to the standard evolutionary scenarios.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.