Paper detail

Accuracy of slender body theory in approximating force exerted by thin fiber on viscous fluid

We consider the accuracy of slender body theory in approximating the force exerted by a thin fiber on the surrounding viscous fluid when the fiber velocity is prescribed. We term this the slender body inverse problem, as it is known that slender body theory converges to a well-posed PDE solution when the force is prescribed and the fiber velocity is unknown. From a PDE perspective, the slender body inverse problem is simply the Dirichlet problem for the Stokes equations, but from an approximation perspective, nonlocal slender body theory exhibits high wavenumber instabilities which complicate analysis. Here we consider two methods for regularizing the slender body approximation: spectral truncation and the $δ$-regularization of Tornberg and Shelley (2004). For a straight, periodic fiber with constant radius $ε>0$, we explicitly calculate the spectrum of the operator mapping fiber velocity to force for both the PDE and the approximations. We show that the spectrum of the original slender body approximation agrees closely with the PDE solution at low wavenumbers but differs at high frequencies, allowing us to define a truncated approximation with a wavenumber cutoff $\sim1/ε$. For both the truncated and $δ$-regularized approximations, we obtain similar convergence results to the PDE solution as $ε\to0$: a fiber velocity with $H^1$ regularity gives $O(ε)$ convergence, while a fiber velocity with at least $H^2$ regularity yields $O(ε^2)$ convergence. Moreover, we determine the dependence of the $δ$-regularized error estimate on the regularization parameter $δ$.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.