Paper detail

Accuracy of Algebraic Fourier Reconstruction for Shifts of Several Signals

We consider the problem of "algebraic reconstruction" of linear combinations of shifts of several known signals $f_1,\ldots,f_k$ from the Fourier samples. Following \cite{Bat.Sar.Yom2}, for each $j=1,\ldots,k$ we choose sampling set $S_j$ to be a subset of the common set of zeroes of the Fourier transforms ${\cal F}(f_\ell), \ \ell \ne j$, on which ${\cal F}(f_j)\ne 0$. It was shown in \cite{Bat.Sar.Yom2} that in this way the reconstruction system is "decoupled" into $k$ separate systems, each including only one of the signals $f_j$. The resulting systems are of a "generalized Prony" form. However, the sampling sets as above may be non-uniform/not "dense enough" to allow for a unique reconstruction of the shifts and amplitudes. In the present paper we study uniqueness and robustness of non-uniform Fourier sampling of signals as above, investigating sampling of exponential polynomials with purely imaginary exponents. As the main tool we apply a well-known result in Harmonic Analysis: the Turán-Nazarov inequality (\cite{Naz}), and its generalization to discrete sets, obtained in \cite{Fri.Yom}. We illustrate our general approach with examples, and provide some simulation results.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.