Paper detail

Accuracy Enhancement for Ear Acoustic Authentication Using Between-class Features

In existing biometric authentication methods, the user must perform an authentication operation such as placing a finger in a scanner or facing a camera. With ear acoustic authentication, acoustic characteristics of the ear canal are used as biometric information. Therefore, a person wearing earphones does not need to perform any authentication operation. In biometric authentication, it is necessary to minimize the false acceptance rate (FAR) so that no unauthorized user is misidentified as an authorized user. However, if the FAR is set low, it increases the false rejection rate (FRR), the rate at which authorized users are falsely recognized as unauthorized users. It has been reported that when FAR is 0.1%, the FRR in ear acoustic authentication reaches as much as 22%. In this study, we propose a method that reduces FRR and enhances authentication accuracy; it generates new ear canal acoustic characteristics called between-class (BC) features, which combine the ear canal acoustic characteristics of authorized and unauthorized users features. The proposed method uses a support vector machine to learn the BC features as the data of authorized users, then generates a hyperplane in an area close to that data. We hypothesize that this would decrease the possibility of misidentifying an unauthorized user as an authorized user and decrease the FRR when the FAR is 0.1%. To evaluate the performance of the proposed method, BC features were applied to ear acoustic authentication, and FAR and FRR were calculated. The FRR with FAR = 0.1% was 7.95% lower than with the previous method, and the equal error rate -- the error rate when FAR and FRR are equivalent -- decreased by 0.15%. These results confirmed that the proposed method can make ear acoustic authentication more convenient while maintaining a high level of security.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.