Paper detail

Accuracy and stability of inversion of power series

This article considers the numerical inversion of the power series $p(x)=1+b_{1}x+b_{2}x^{2}+\cdots$ to compute the inverse series $q(x)$ satisfying $p(x)q(x)=1$. Numerical inversion is a special case of triangular back-substitution, which has been known for its beguiling numerical stability since the classic work of Wilkinson (1961). We prove the numerical stability of inversion of power series and obtain bounds on numerical error. A range of examples show these bounds to be quite good. When $p(x)$ is a polynomial and $x=a$ is a root with $p(a)=0$, we show that root deflation via the simple division $p(x)/(x-a)$ can trigger instabilities relevant to polynomial root finding and computation of finite-difference weights. When $p(x)$ is a polynomial, the accuracy of the computed inverse $q(x)$ is connected to the pseudozeros of $p(x)$.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.