Paper detail

Accretion Properties of PDS 70b with MUSE

We report a new evaluation of the accretion properties of PDS~70b obtained with VLT/MUSE. The main difference from previous studies in Haffert et al. (2019) and Aoyama & Ikoma (2019) is in the mass accretion rate. Simultaneous multiple line observations, such as H$α$ and H$β$, can better constrain the physical properties of an accreting planet. While we clearly detected H$α$ emissions from PDS~70b, no H$β$ emissions were detected. We estimate the line flux of H$β$ with a 3-$σ$ upper limit to be 2.3~$\times$~10$^{-16}$~erg~s$^{-1}$~cm$^{-2}$. The flux ratio $F_{\rm Hβ}$/$F_{\rm Hα}$ for PDS~70b is $<$~0.28. Numerical investigations by Aoyama et al. (2018) suggest that $F_{\rm Hβ}$/$F_{\rm Hα}$ should be close to unity if the extinction is negligible. We attribute the reduction of the flux ratio to the extinction, and estimate the extinction of H$α$ ($A_{\rm Hα}$) for PDS~70b to be $>$~2.0~mag using the interstellar extinction value. %The expected $A_{\rm Hα}$ value in the gap of the protoplanetary disk at the PDS~70b location is 2.4~mag, which is consistent with the estimated extinction. By combining with the H$α$ linewidth and the dereddening line luminosity of H$α$, %we derive the PDS~70b dynamical mass and mass accretion rate to be \hashimotor{12~$\pm$~3~$M_{\rm Jup}$} and $\gtrsim$~5~$\times$~10$^{-7}$~$M_{\rm Jup}$~yr$^{-1}$, respectively. we derive the PDS~70b mass accretion rate to be $\gtrsim$~5~$\times$~10$^{-7}$~$M_{\rm Jup}$~yr$^{-1}$. The PDS~70b mass accretion rate is an order of magnitude larger than that of PDS~70. We found that the filling factor $f_{\rm f}$ (the fractional area of the planetary surface emitting H$α$) is $\gtrsim$0.01, which is similar to the typical stellar value. The small value of $f_{\rm f}$ indicates that the H$α$ emitting areas are localized at the surface of PDS~70b.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.