Paper detail

Accretion Processes in the Nucleus of M31

The hypothesized supermassive black hole in the nucleus of M31 (which we shall hereafter call M31*) has many features in common with Sgr A* at the Galactic Center, yet they differ in several significant and important ways. Though M31* is probably ten times heavier, its radio luminosity at 3.6 cm is only one third that of Sgr A*. At the same time, M31* is apparently thousands of times more luminous in X-rays than its Galactic Center counterpart. Thus, a comparative study of these objects can be valuable in helping us to understand the underlying physical basis for their activity. We show here that the accretion model being developed for Sgr A* comprises two branches of solutions, distinguished by the relative importance of cooling compared to compressional heating at the radius $r_C$ where the ambient gas is captured by the black hole. For typical conditions in the ISM, the initial temperature ($T[r_C]\sim 10^6-10^7$ K) sits on the unstable branch of the cooling function. Depending on the actual value of $T(r_C)$ and the accretion rate, the plasma settles either onto a hot branch (attaining a temperature as high as $10^{10} K$ or so at small radii) or a cold branch, in which $T$ drops to $\sim 10^4$ K. Sgr A* is presumably a `hot' black hole. We show here that the VLA, UV and {\it Chandra} observations of M31* reveal it to be a member of the `cold' black hole family. We discuss several predicted features in the spectrum of M31* that may be testable by future multi-wavelength observations, including the presence of a prominent UV spike (from hydrogen line emission) that would be absent on the hot branch.

preprint2001arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.