Paper detail

Accretion in Gravitationally Contracting Clouds

Accretion flow in a contracting magnetized isothermal cloud was studied using magnetohydrodynamical simulations and a nested grid technique. First, the interstellar magnetized cloud experiences a ``runaway collapse'' phase, in which the central density increases drastically within a finite time scale. Finally, it enters an accretion phase, in which inflowing matter accretes onto a central high-density disk or a new-born star. We found that the accretion rate reaches (4 -- 40) $\times c_s^3/G$, where $c_s$ and $G$ represent the isothermal sound speed and the gravitational constant, respectively. This is much larger than the standard accretion rate of $0.975c_s^3/G$ for a hydrostatic isothermal spherical cloud (Shu 1977, AAA19.065.044). Due to the effect of an extra infall velocity achieved in the runaway phase ($\sim 2 c_s$), the accretion rate is boosted. This rate declines with time in contrast to Shu's solution, but keeps $\gtsim 2.5 c_s^3/G$. The observed gas infall rate around proto-stars such as L1551 IRS 5 and HL Tau is also discussed.

preprint1996arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.