Paper detail

Accretion Driven Evolution of Quasars and Black Holes: Theoretical Models

We present a flexible framework for constructing physical models of quasar evolution that can incorporate a variety of observational constraints, such as multi-wavelength luminosity functions, estimated masses and accretion rates of active black holes, space densities of quasar hosts, and the local black hole mass function. We focus on the accretion rate distribution p(mdot|M,z), the probability that a black hole of mass M at redshift z accretes at a rate mdot in Eddington units. Given the radiative efficiency as a function of mdot, the quasar luminosity function (QLF) is determined by a convolution of p(mdot|M,z) with the black hole mass function n(M,z). In the absence of mergers p(mdot|M,z) also determines the full evolution of n(M,z), given a "boundary value" of n(M) at some redshift. Matching the observed decline of the QLF break luminosity at z<2 requires either a shift towards lower characteristic accretion rates or an evolving mass dependence of p(mdot) that preferentially shuts off accretion onto high mass black holes. These two scenarios make different predictions for the masses and accretion rates of active black holes. If the first mechanism dominates, then the QLF changes character between z=2 and z=0, shifting from a sequence of black hole mass towards a sequence of L/Ledd. We construct and compare five models that illustrate different assumptions about the quasar population: short and long lifetime models dominated by unobscured thin-disk accretion, a model with a high fraction of obscured quasars, and models in which mergers or ADAF accretion produce substantial black hole growth at low redshift. We discuss the observational advances that would be most valuable for distinguishing such models and for pinning down the physics that drives black hole and quasar evolution. (Abridged)

preprint2003arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.