Paper detail

Accretion disk around the rotating Damour-Solodukhin wormhole

A new rotating generalization of the Damour-Solodukhin wormhole (RDSWH), called Kerr-like wormhole, has recently been proposed and investigated by Bueno \textit{et al} for echoes in the gravitational wave signal. We show a novel feature of the RDSWH, viz., that the kinematic properties such as the ISCO\ or marginally stable radius $r_{\text{ms}}$, efficiency $ε$ and the disk potential $V_{\text{eff}}$ are \textit{independent} of $λ$ (which means they are identical to their KBH counterparts for any given spin). Differences however appear in the emissivity properties for higher values $0.1<λ\leq 1$ (say) and for the extreme spin $a_{\star}=0.998$. The kinematic and emissivity are generic properties as variations of the wormhole mass and the rate of accretion within the model preserve these properties. Specifically, the behavior of the luminosity peak is quite opposite to each other for the two objects, which could be useful from the viewpoint of observations. Apart from this, an estimate of the difference $Δ_λ$ in the maxima of flux of radiation $F(r)$ shows non-zero values but is too tiny to be observable at present for $λ< 10^{-3}$ permitted by the strong lensing bound. The broad conclusion is that RDSWH\ are experimentally indistinguishable from KBH by accretion characteristics.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.