Paper detail

Accretion and star formation rates in low redshift type-II active galactic nuclei

Accretion and star formation (SF) rates in low redshift SDSS type-II active galactic nuclei (AGN) are critically evaluated. Comparison with photoionization models indicates that bolometric luminosity (Lbol) estimates based on L(oiii 5007A) severely underestimate Lbol in low ionization sources such as LINERs. An alternative method based on L(hb) is less sensitive to ionization level and a novel method, based on a combination of L(oiii 5007A) and L(oi 6300A), is erhaps the best. Using this method I show that low ionization AGN are accreting faster than assumed until now. Significant related other findings are: 1. Any type-II AGN property related to the black hole (BH) mass is more reliably obtained by removing blue galaxies from the sample. 2. Seyfert 2s and LINER 2s form a continuous sequence of L/Ledd with no indication for a change in accretion mechanism, or mode of mass supply. There are very few, if any, LINERs in all type-I samples which results in a much arrower L/Ledd distribution compared with type-II samples. 3. There is a strong correlation between SF luminosity, Lsf, and Lbol over more than five orders of magnitude in luminosity. This leads to a simple relationship between bulge and BH growth rates, g(bulge)/g(BH) propto Lbol^(-0.2), where g(bulge)/g(BH) = 115 for Lbol=10^42 erg/sec. Seyfert 2s and LINER 2s follow the same Lsf-Lbol correlation for all sources with a stellar age indicator, D4000, smaller than 1.8. This suggests that a similar fraction of SF gas finds its way to the center in all AGN. 4. Lbol, Lsf, L/Ledd and the specific SF rate follow D4000 in a similar way.

preprint2009arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.