Paper detail

Accreting planets as dust dams in `transition' discs

We investigate under what circumstances an embedded planet in a protoplanetary disc may sculpt the dust distribution such that it observationally presents as a `transition' disc. We concern ourselves with `transition' discs that have large holes ($\gtrsim 10$ AU) and high accretion rates ($\sim 10^{-9}-10^{-8}$ M$_\odot$ yr$^{-1}$). Particularly, those discs which photoevaporative models struggle to explain. Assuming the standard picture for how massive planets sculpt their parent discs, along with the observed accretion rates in `transition' discs, we find that the accretion luminosity from the forming planet is significant, and can dominate over the stellar luminosity at the gap edge. This planetary accretion luminosity can apply a significant radiation pressure to small ($s\lesssim 1μ$m) dust particles provided they are suitably decoupled from the gas. Secular evolution calculations that account for the evolution of the gas and dust components in a disc with an embedded, accreting planet, show that only with the addition of the radiation pressure can we explain the full observed characteristics of a `transition' disc (NIR dip in the SED, mm cavity and high accretion rate). At suitably high planet masses ($\gtrsim 3-4$ M$_J$), radiation pressure from the accreting planet is able to hold back the small dust particles, producing a heavily dust-depleted inner disc that is optically thin (vertically and radially) to Infra-Red radiation. We use our models to calculate synthetic observations and present a observational evolutionary scenario for a forming planet, sculpting its parent disc. The planet-disc system will present as a `transition' disc with a dip in the SED, only when the planet mass and planetary accretion rate is high enough. At other times it will present as a disc with a primordial SED, but with a cavity in the mm, as observed in a handful of protoplanetary discs.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.