Paper detail

Acceptable Inverse Power Law Potential Quintessence with n=18/7

We present a particle physics quintessence model which agrees well with existing cosmological data, including the position of the acoustic peaks. This model has an inverse power law potential (IPL) with $n=18/7\sim 2.57$ and it gives $\weff=-0.75$, an acoustic scale $l_A=307$ and a density contrast $\s8=0.95$. Models with $n>1$ have been said to be disfavored by the analysis of the acoustic peaks. However, the results are not correct. The main reason is that the tracker approximation has been used in deriving the IPL constrains and for $n<5$ the scalar field has not reached its tracker value by present day. The model can be derived from particle physics, using Affleck-Dine-Seiberg "ADS" superpotential, for a non-abelian gauge group with $N_c=8, N_f=1$. The advantage of having $N_f=1$ is that there is only one degree of freedom below the condensation scale given by the condensate (quintessence) $ϕ^2=<Q\tilde Q>$ field. The condensation scale is at $1 GeV$ a very interesting scale since it connects the quintessence "Q" with the standard model "SM" scale. The similarity in energy scales between $Q$ and $SM$ scale gives an "explanation" to the coincidence problem. The fact that only recently the universe is accelerating is a natural consequence of the Q scale and the evolution of $ϕ$.

preprint2002arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.