Paper detail

Acceleration without Temperature

We show that while some non-uniformly accelerating observers (NUAOs) do indeed see a Bose-Einstein distribution of particles for the expectation value of the number operator in the Minkowski vacuum state, the density matrix is non-thermal and therefore a definition of temperature is not warranted. This is due to the fact that our NUAOs do not see event horizons in the spacetime. More specifically, the Minkowski vacuum state is perceived by our NUAOs as a single-mode squeezed state as opposed to the two-mode squeezed state characteristic of uniformly accelerating observers. Both single and two-mode squeezed states are pure quantum states; however, tracing over degrees of freedom in one of the modes of the two-mode squeezed state reduces the pure density matrix to a thermal density matrix. It is this property in the two-mode squeezed state that allows one to consistently define a temperature. In the single-mode case, an equivalent tracing is neither required nor available.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.