Paper detail

Acceleration Relations in the Milky Way as Differentiators of Modified Gravity Theories

The dynamical mass of galaxies and the Newtonian acceleration generated from the baryons have been found to be strongly correlated. This correlation is known as 'Mass-Discrepancy Acceleration Relation' (MDAR). Further investigations have revealed a tighter relation - 'Radial Acceleration Relation' (RAR) - between the observed total acceleration and the (Newtonian) acceleration produced by the baryons. So far modified gravity theories have remained more successful than $Λ$CDM to explain these relations. However, a recent investigation has pointed out that, when RAR is expressed as a difference between the observed acceleration and the expected Newtonian acceleration due to baryons (which has been called the 'Halo acceleration relation or HAR'), it provides a stronger test for modified gravity theories and dark matter hypothesis. Extending our previous work \citep{kt2018}, we present a case study of modified gravity theories, in particular Weyl conformal gravity and Modified Newtonian Dynamics (MOND), using recent inferred acceleration data for the Milky Way. We investigate how well these theories of gravity and the RAR scaling law can explain the current observation.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.