Paper detail

Accelerated Coronary MRI with sRAKI: A Database-Free Self-Consistent Neural Network k-space Reconstruction for Arbitrary Undersampling

This study aims to accelerate coronary MRI using a novel reconstruction algorithm, called self-consistent robust artificial-neural-networks for k-space interpolation (sRAKI). sRAKI performs iterative parallel imaging reconstruction by enforcing coil self-consistency using subject-specific neural networks. This approach extends the linear convolutions in SPIRiT to nonlinear interpolation using convolutional neural networks (CNNs). These CNNs are trained individually for each scan using the scan-specific autocalibrating signal (ACS) data. Reconstruction is performed by imposing the learned self-consistency and data-consistency enabling sRAKI to support random undersampling patterns. Fully-sampled targeted right coronary artery MRI was acquired in six healthy subjects for evaluation. The data were retrospectively undersampled, and reconstructed using SPIRiT, $\ell_1$-SPIRiT and sRAKI for acceleration rates of 2 to 5. Additionally, prospectively undersampled whole-heart coronary MRI was acquired to further evaluate performance. The results indicate that sRAKI reduces noise amplification and blurring artifacts compared with SPIRiT and $\ell_1$-SPIRiT, especially at high acceleration rates in targeted data. Quantitative analysis shows that sRAKI improves normalized mean-squared-error (~44% and ~21% over SPIRiT and $\ell_1$-SPIRiT at rate 5) and vessel sharpness (~10% and ~20% over SPIRiT and $\ell_1$-SPIRiT at rate 5). In addition, whole-heart data shows the sharpest coronary arteries when resolved using sRAKI, with 11% and 15% improvement in vessel sharpness over SPIRiT and $\ell_1$-SPIRiT, respectively. Thus, sRAKI is a database-free neural network-based reconstruction technique that may further accelerate coronary MRI with arbitrary undersampling patterns, while improving noise resilience over linear parallel imaging and image sharpness over $\ell_1$ regularization techniques.

preprint2019arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.