Paper detail

Accelerate Cycle-Level Full-System Simulation of Multi-Core RISC-V Systems with Binary Translation

It has always been difficult to balance the accuracy and performance of ISSs. RTL simulators or systems such as gem5 are used to execute programs in a cycle-accurate manner but are often prohibitively slow. In contrast, functional simulators such as QEMU can run large benchmarks to completion in a reasonable time yet capture few performance metrics and fail to model complex interactions between multiple cores. This paper presents a novel multi-purpose simulator that exploits binary translation to offer fast cycle-level full-system simulations. Its functional simulation mode outperforms QEMU and, if desired, it is possible to switch between functional and timing modes at run-time. Cycle-level simulations of RISC-V multi-core processors are possible at more than 20 MIPS, a useful middle ground in terms of accuracy and performance with simulation speeds nearly 100 times those of more detailed cycle-accurate models.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.