Paper detail

Abusing Cache Line Dirty States to Leak Information in Commercial Processors

Caches have been used to construct various types of covert and side channels to leak information. Most existing cache channels exploit the timing difference between cache hits and cache misses. However, we introduce a new and broader classification of cache covert channel attacks: Hit+Miss, Hit+Hit, and Miss+Miss. We highlight that cache misses for cache lines in different states may have more significant time differences, and these can be used as timing channels. Based on this classification, we propose a new stable and stealthy Miss+Miss cache channel. Write-back caches are widely deployed in modern processors. This paper presents in detail a way in which replacement latency differences can be used to construct timing-based channels (called WB channels) to leak information in a write-back cache. Any modification to a cache line by a sender will set it to the dirty state, and the receiver can observe this through measuring the latency of replacing this cache set. We also demonstrate how senders could exploit a different number of dirty cache lines in a cache set to improve transmission bandwidth with symbols encoding multiple bits. The peak transmission bandwidths of the WB channels in commercial systems can vary between 1300 and 4400~kbps per cache set in a hyper-threaded setting without shared memory between the sender and the receiver. In contrast to most existing cache channels, which always target specific memory addresses, the new WB channels focus on the cache set and cache line states, making it difficult for the channel to be disturbed by other processes on the core, and they can still work in a cache using a random replacement policy. We also analyzed the stealthiness of WB channels from the perspective of the number of cache loads and cache miss rates. We discuss and evaluate possible defenses. The paper finishes by discussing various forms of side-channel attack.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.