Paper detail

Abundance of 26Al and 60Fe in evolving Giant Molecular Clouds

The nucleosynthesis and ejection of radioactive $^{26}$Al (t$_{1/2} \sim$ 0.72\,Myr) and $^{60}$Fe, (t$_{1/2} \sim$ 2.5\,Myr) into the interstellar medium is dominated by the stellar winds of massive stars and supernova type II explosions. Studies of meteorites and their components indicate that the initial abundances of these short-lived radionuclides in the solar protoplanetary disk were higher than the background levels of the galaxy inferred from $γ$--ray astronomy and models of the galactic chemical evolution. This observation has been used to argue for a late-stage addition of stellar debris to the Solar System's parental molecular cloud or, alternatively, the solar protoplanetary disk, thereby requiring a special scenario for the formation of our Solar System. Here, we use supercomputers to model---from first principles---the production, transport and admixing of freshly synthesized $^{26}$Al and $^{60}$Fe in star-forming regions within giant molecular clouds. Under typical star-formation conditions, the levels of $^{26}$Al in most star-forming regions are comparable to that deduced from meteorites, suggesting that the presence of short-lived radionuclides in the early Solar System is a generic feature of the chemical evolution of giant molecular clouds. The $^{60}$Fe/$^{26}$Al yield ratio of $\approx 0.2$ calculated from our simulations is consistent with the galactic value of 0.15 $\pm$ 0.06 inferred from $γ$--ray astronomy but is significantly higher than most current Solar System measurements indicate. We suggest that estimates based on differentiated meteorites and some chondritic components may not be representative of the initial $^{60}$Fe abundance of the bulk Solar System.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.