Paper detail

Abundance and group coalescence timescales of compact groups of galaxies in the EAGLE simulation

Observations of compact groups of galaxies (CGs) indicate that their abundance has not significantly changed since $z=0.2$. This balance between the timescales for formation and destruction of CGs is challenging if the typical timescale for CG members to merge into one massive galaxy is as short as historically assumed ($<$ 0.1 Hubble times). Following the evolution of CGs over time in a cosmological simulation (EAGLE), we quantify the contributions of individual processes that in the end explain the observed abundance of CGs. We find that despite the usually applied maximum line-of-sight velocity difference of $1000\,\mathrm{km\,s}^{-1}$ within the group members, the majority of CGs ($\approx 60$ per cent) are elongated along the line-of-sight by at least a factor of two. These CGs are mostly transient as they are only compact in projection. In more spherical systems $\approx 80$ per cent of galaxies at $z>0.4$ merge into one massive galaxy before the simulation end ($z=0$) and we find that the typical timescale for this process is 2-3 Gyr. We conclude that the combination of large fractions of interlopers and the longer median group coalescence timescale of CGs alleviates the need for a fast formation process to explain the observed abundance of CGs for $z<0.2$.

preprint2019arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.