Paper detail

Absorption of Very High Energy Gamma-Rays by Intergalactic Infrared Radiation: A New Determination

We present a new calculation of the intergalactic gamma-ray absorption coefficient as a function of both energy and redshift. In reexamining this problem, we make use of a new, empirically based calculation (as opposed to previous model calculations) of the intergalactic infrared radiation field. We find smaller opacities than those given previously (Stecker & De Jager 1997). We apply our results to the new observations of the flaring gamma-ray spectra of Mrk421 and Mrk501, both at a redshift of apx. 0.03. Our new calculations indicate that there should be no significant curvature in the spectra of these sources for energies below 10 TeV, as indicated by recent observations. However, the intrinsic spectra of these sources should be harder by apx. 0.2 to 0.45 in the spectral index in the 1 to 10 TeV range with an intergalactic absorption cutoff above apx. 20 TeV.

preprint1998arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.