Paper detail

Absorption bias: An ideal descriptor for radiation tolerance of nanocrystalline BCC metals

To evaluate the radiation tolerance of nanocrystalline (NC) materials, the damage effects of Fe and W as typical body-centered cubic (BCC) metals under uniform irradiation are studied by a sequential multi-scale modelling framework. An ideal descriptor, the absorption bias (the ratio of the absorption abilities of grain boundaries (GBs) to interstitials (I) and vacancies (V)), is proposed to characterize the radiation tolerance of materials with different grain sizes. Low absorption bias promotes defects annihilation through enhancing I-V recombination and optimally tuning its competition with GB absorption. Thus, the lower absorption bias, the higher anti-irradiation performance of NC BCC metals is. Furthermore, by comprehensively considering the mechanical property, thermal stability and radiation resistance, nano-crystals are recommended for Fe-based structural materials but coarse crystals for W-based plasma-facing materials. This work reevaluates the radiation resistance of NC materials, resulting in new strategies for designing structural materials of nuclear devices through manipulating grain sizes.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access9 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.