Paper detail

Absence of thermalisation in a Fermi liquid

We study a weak interaction quench in a three-dimensional Fermi gas. We first show that, under some general assumptions on time-dependent perturbation theory, the perturbative expansion of the long-wavelength structure factor $S(\bq)$ is not compatible with the hypothesis that steady-state averages correspond to thermal ones. In particular, $S(\bq)$ does develop an analytical component $\sim const. + O(q^2)$ at $\bq\to\bnot$, as implied by thermalization, but, in contrast, it maintains a non-analytic part $\sim |\bq|$ characteristic of a Fermi-liquid at zero-temperature. In real space, this non-analyticity corresponds to persisting power-law decaying density-density correlations, whereas thermalization would predict only an exponential decay. We next consider the case of a dilute gas, where one can obtain non-perturbative results in the interaction strength but at lowest order in the density. We find that in the steady-state the momentum distribution jump at the Fermi surface remains finite, though smaller than in equilibrium, up to second order in $k_F f_0$, where $f_0$ is the scattering length of two particles in the vacuum. Both results question the emergence of a finite length scale in the quench-dynamics as expected by thermalization.

preprint2014arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.