Paper detail

Absence of backward infinite paths for first-passage percolation in arbitrary dimension

In first-passage percolation (FPP), one places nonnegative random variables (weights) $(t_e)$ on the edges of a graph and studies the induced weighted graph metric. We consider FPP on $\mathbb{Z}^d$ for $d \geq 2$ and analyze the geometric properties of geodesics, which are optimizing paths for the metric. Specifically, we address the question of existence of bigeodesics, which are doubly-infinite paths whose subpaths are geodesics. It is a famous conjecture originating from a question of Furstenberg and most strongly supported for $d=2$ that for continuously distributed i.i.d. weights, there a.s. are no bigeodesics. We provide the first progress on this question in general dimensions under no unproven assumptions. Our main result is that geodesic graphs, introduced in a previous paper of two of the authors, constructed in any deterministic direction a.s. do not contain doubly-infinite paths. As a consequence, one can construct random graphs of subsequential limits of point-to-hyperplane geodesics which contain no bigeodesics. This gives evidence that bigeodesics, if they exist, cannot be constructed in a translation-invariant manner as limits of point-to-hyperplane geodesics.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.