Paper detail

Absence of an intrinsic value for the surface recombination velocity in doped semiconductors

A self-consistent expression for the surface recombination velocity $S$ and the surface Fermi level unpinning energy as a function of light excitation power ($P$) is presented for n- and p-type semiconductors doped above the 10$^{16}$ cm$^{-3}$ range. Measurements of $S$ on p-type GaAs films using a novel polarized microluminescence technique are used to illustrate two limiting cases of the model. For a naturally oxidized surface $S$ is described by a power law in $P$ whereas for a passivated surface $S^{-1}$ varies logarithmically with $P$. Furthermore, the variation in $S$ with surface state density and bulk doping level is found to be the result of Fermi level unpinning rather than a change in the intrinsic surface recombination velocity. It is concluded that $S$ depends on $P$ throughout the experimentally accessible range of excitation powers and therefore that no instrinsic value can be determined. Previously reported values of $S$ on a range of semiconducting materials are thus only valid for a specific excitation power.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access7 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.