Paper detail

About the waiting time for a strong earthquake

As an object of study, we chose the global activity of strong earthquakes (M > 7). The subject of the study is the waiting time for the next strong earthquake. The purpose of the study is to compare two distributions of waiting time, one of which is calculated when ordering events according to world time, and the second when ordering according to proper time. We have come up with unique underground clock to counting proper time. The average waiting time is 25 days in world time, and 10 ticks in proper time. We assert with a high degree of confidence that both distributions obey an exponential law. The coefficients of determination are 0.94 in the first case, and 0.98 in the second case. This is all the more surprising since our underground clock is a rather crude measuring instrument. We also consider general issues related to the chronologization of earthquakes. Keywords: proper time, deactivation factor, main shock, foreshocks and aftershocks, exponential and power distributions.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.