Paper detail

ABAW: Learning from Synthetic Data & Multi-Task Learning Challenges

This paper describes the fourth Affective Behavior Analysis in-the-wild (ABAW) Competition, held in conjunction with European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV), 2022. The 4th ABAW Competition is a continuation of the Competitions held at IEEE CVPR 2022, ICCV 2021, IEEE FG 2020 and IEEE CVPR 2017 Conferences, and aims at automatically analyzing affect. In the previous runs of this Competition, the Challenges targeted Valence-Arousal Estimation, Expression Classification and Action Unit Detection. This year the Competition encompasses two different Challenges: i) a Multi-Task-Learning one in which the goal is to learn at the same time (i.e., in a multi-task learning setting) all the three above mentioned tasks; and ii) a Learning from Synthetic Data one in which the goal is to learn to recognise the basic expressions from artificially generated data and generalise to real data. The Aff-Wild2 database is a large scale in-the-wild database and the first one that contains annotations for valence and arousal, expressions and action units. This database is the basis for the above Challenges. In more detail: i) s-Aff-Wild2 -- a static version of Aff-Wild2 database -- has been constructed and utilized for the purposes of the Multi-Task-Learning Challenge; and ii) some specific frames-images from the Aff-Wild2 database have been used in an expression manipulation manner for creating the synthetic dataset, which is the basis for the Learning from Synthetic Data Challenge. In this paper, at first we present the two Challenges, along with the utilized corpora, then we outline the evaluation metrics and finally present the baseline systems per Challenge, as well as their derived results. More information regarding the Competition can be found in the competition's website: https://ibug.doc.ic.ac.uk/resources/eccv-2023-4th-abaw/.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.