Paper detail

Ab initio study of the density dependence of the Grüneisen parameter at pressures up to 360 GPa

Ab initio calculations based on the Density Functional Theory are used to show that the Debye frequency is a linear function of density to a high accuracy for several elemental solids at pressures (at least) up to 360 GPa. This implies that the ratio of density over the (Debye-frequency-based) vibrational Grüneisen parameter is a linear function of density in this region. Numerical data from first principles calculations for several systems at temperatures up to 2000K suggest that this is also true for the thermal Grüneisen parameter in the same range of pressure. Our analytical form of the vibrational Grüneisen parameter is applied to an implementation of the Lindemann's melting criterion to obtain a simple extrapolation formula for the melting temperatures of materials at higher densities. This prediction is tested against available experimental and numerical data for several elemental solids.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.